MAITRI BACHAAO .. REDEVELOPMENT KO AAGE LAAO
OC ... OC ... OC ...
June 22, 2016. Ref. No. : RSS/2016-26
To,
The Hon. Secretary,
Maitri Park CHSL.,
132-135, Sion Trombay Road,
Chembur, Mumbai - 400 071.
Sub. : Redevelopment Project of Maitri Park CHSL.
Ref. : Your letter dt. 22-03-2015;
Letter dt. 17-03-2015 .
Letter dt. 06-04-2015 .
Dear Sir,
This letter of mine has specfic reference to your above referred letter dt. 22-03-2015 which was replied to point to point vide my letter dt. 06-05-2015 which was substantiated by documentary evidences disapproving your explanations, contentions and allegations in your said letter of my wife trying to defame the Managing Committee members. You have failed to reply to her said letter which goes to prove that the documentary evidences furnished (Attachments 1 to 10) by her only confirmed the contentions of the letter dt. 17-03-2015 to be true. I am still awaiting your reply to my
said letter dt. 06-05-2015 and am looking forwards to the denial of your managing committees wrong-doings. Your silence on the said letter would only amount to you and your managing committee accepting your defaults on the redevelopment project by having cheated the society
members for their own personal gains.
You may be informed that my wife, the only woman with no backing of any member had singularly
stood for the society members against the irregularities and agreement violation in our redevelopment project. And she was from time to time informing the managing committee and
the members at large about the irregularities being committed in our redevelopment project.
Your letter dt. 22-03-2015 carries only 7 signatures of the Mananging Committee members
instead of 9 members, viz. Mr. B.C. Thadani, Mr. M.H. Nayak, Mr. Suresh Arora, Mr. Kishore Vengsarkar, Mr. Vinod Thadani, Mrs. Jaya Damodaran and Mr. Sanjay Lodha. Kindly enlighten me as to why the other two members viz. Mr. Anil Kapur and Mr. Laxman Gurbaxani who seem to
be isolated from your golden group not sign your said letter along with the other MC members? Was it because they were not invited to this so called meeting or is it that they refused to sign the letter which contained invalid and irrelevant explanations to shelter the wrong-doings of the consortium of the Managing Committee, Builder and the Architect. You and your committee members went on to
demoralise Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Saini (a Woman Senior Citizen) by not hesitating to institute both Civil and Criminal proceedings for defaming the honorary committee members. Since you could not prove her contentions and charges incorrect, why civil and criminal proceedings not be
initiated by the society members against all you 7 members who are signatories to the said letter of yours for defaming Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur and landing the redevelopment project of our society in a big mess. I wonder how Mrs. Veena Thadani, a High Court Advocate who is supporting the cause of the dance bar girls for the upliftment of women of our country would react to defamation of a woman, Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Saini, who is devotedly working for expediting the standstill
redevelopment project of our society in safeguarding her, and in framing the Managing Committee for their lingering attitude and tremendous delay beyond expections with the completion of only 2 towers in a period of 10 years and that too without OC along with various other non-complaince issues. However in the case of the redevelopment project of our society it appears that the same Mrs. Veena Thadani, who is also a member of the society and aided by her better half in supporting the irregularities and illegality of our society’s managing committee by giving an indirect protection to the MC members.
Sincerely yours,
RANJIT SINGH SAINI
Member, Flat No. A-30/1, Maitri Park CHSL.
c.c. : Members of Maitri Park CHSL.
Ranjit Singh Saini
FOR MEMBERS INFORMATION
Maitri Park CHSL In-house Bulletin
June 23, 2016 (Red Letter alert)
MAITRI BACHAAO .. REDEVELOPMENT KO AAGE LAAO
OC ... OC ... OC ...
The Inside Story and the Truth Declaration of our Society’s Redevelopment Project with
M/s. Hiranandani Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Architect and the Managing Committee
in the 5 years of elected period.
During the formation of the new Managing Committee in the year 2011 there was a revolution in the
society of having a change in getting transparency in the redevelopment project as the said redevelopment agreement was null and void and irregularities committed regarding issues on 70000 sq.ft. balconies, violation of agreement and other relevant issues introduction of PMC which was the main manfesto of the redevelopment project. All youngsters elected above the age group of 45 lend theirselves for bringing better prospects and for timely completion of the project by standing together. And today the whole committee with other tainted members whom we proposed and had confidence in, turned turtle, let down the whole society to a disgusting position. The so called member, in particular, Mr. Suresh Arora, a new born baby in whom the members had good faith in his transparency and good administration, reversed over a period of time along with Mr. Bhagwan Thadani and other 5 members, in influencing the other close members and friends who were the cream of this project viz. Mr. Anand Rao, Mr. Naval Shinde, Mr. Sunil Shahani, Mr. Virendra Khanna, Mr. Hemraj Gandhi, by taking them into confidence and giving them undue benefits to their advantage, like transferring of shares in flats of likelyhoods, giving extra benefit in carpet areas, making non-related blood relationship a shareholder in the new tower flats, assistance for internal flat repairs at the time of external building repairs for selected individuals, flat transfers and granting benefits to them from members sinking fund, creating agents and brokers in the society for buying and selling of flats,
cheating andbenefitting by committee members on single tender basis in road and building repair works with royalties and commissions, etc. To kill time and to gain advantage of maximum benefits for the builder with the new DC Rules, the Managing Committee, through the said members
initiated a propaganda of going in for new greenfield project and 1:1 flat. All these members along with Mr. Bhagwan Thadani, Mrs. Veena Thadani, Mr. Suresh Arora and the other Managing Committee Members had their meetings in the banquet hall of Mrs. Jaya Damodaran,
a Managing Committee member (in Building No. 22) which was specially made for the redevelopment project. The main purpose of these meetings was probably to garner support of most of the members of multi-storied buildings for benefitting the builder with maximum profit, and substantially personal gains for themselves and making a position for their future vote bank and in the process giving a step-motherly treatment to residents of F building by not hearing their grievances.
Achievements & Character of Mr. Suresh Arora
During the campaigning of elections in the year 2011, Mr. Suresh Arora and Mr. Laxman Gurbaxani went to meet Mr. Harish Hinduja at Veena Wines in Chembur for obtaining signature against Mr. Bhagwan Thadani, to which he obliged, prior to elections against the balcony issue of 70,000 Sq. ft. which was walloped by M/s. Hiranandani Constructions Pvt. Ltd. by cheating the society members, is now speaking in favour of the same Mr. Bhagwan Thadani. And now it seems Mr. Suresh Arora has gone and sat on the lap of the present Hon. Secretary adding to the other group of 5 MC members.
Mr. Suresh Arora was also instrumental in evicting the Beauty / Massage / Objectionable Parlour which was to come up in Building No. F, Flat No. 2 and which was purchased by a new member. As the then managing committee headed by Mr. Katyal (Hon. Chairman) and Mr. Bhagwan Thadani
(Hon. Secretary) did not take any action some of the members of our society pulled down the steel gate of the said upcoming Beauty Parlour and deposited the same in the society premises near the well. It has now been brought to my knowledge, and perhaps most of the society members may be knowing that the said Mr. Suresh Arora sold out the gate (amount in thousands) and siphoned off the
money instead of crediting the same in the society’s account.
His other achievements at his earlier residence in M/s. RNA Park CHSL, Vasinaka, Chembur would be brought to light very shortly.
All this mess has come about only because the members of our society are not united in coming forward to voice their opinion on this delayed redevelopment project. It is high time the members rise up and confront the current situation with a strong voice. Mr. Bhagwan Thadani was given a second golden opportunity as a Hon. Secretary to use his good office in expediting the redevelopment project. But instead he chose to go in for his and his family’s personal gains of buying, selling and renting of properties within the society and indirectly giving an advantage to the builder. At this juncture it is the members who have to judge and reject the current managing committee members (group of 7) for their ineffectiveness in taking forward the redevelopment project. The ball is in the members court to analyse the contributions made by the selected group of the managing committee and their other ancillary supporters, as mentioned hereinabove, and to consider the future redevelopment process of our
society with the required builders.
WAKE UP MAITRI PARK WAALO ...
EITHER IT IS NOW, OR NEVER EVER ...
OC ... OC ... OC ...
June 22, 2016. Ref. No. : RSS/2016-26
To,
The Hon. Secretary,
Maitri Park CHSL.,
132-135, Sion Trombay Road,
Chembur, Mumbai - 400 071.
Sub. : Redevelopment Project of Maitri Park CHSL.
Ref. : Your letter dt. 22-03-2015;
Letter dt. 17-03-2015 .
Letter dt. 06-04-2015 .
Dear Sir,
This letter of mine has specfic reference to your above referred letter dt. 22-03-2015 which was replied to point to point vide my letter dt. 06-05-2015 which was substantiated by documentary evidences disapproving your explanations, contentions and allegations in your said letter of my wife trying to defame the Managing Committee members. You have failed to reply to her said letter which goes to prove that the documentary evidences furnished (Attachments 1 to 10) by her only confirmed the contentions of the letter dt. 17-03-2015 to be true. I am still awaiting your reply to my
said letter dt. 06-05-2015 and am looking forwards to the denial of your managing committees wrong-doings. Your silence on the said letter would only amount to you and your managing committee accepting your defaults on the redevelopment project by having cheated the society
members for their own personal gains.
You may be informed that my wife, the only woman with no backing of any member had singularly
stood for the society members against the irregularities and agreement violation in our redevelopment project. And she was from time to time informing the managing committee and
the members at large about the irregularities being committed in our redevelopment project.
Your letter dt. 22-03-2015 carries only 7 signatures of the Mananging Committee members
instead of 9 members, viz. Mr. B.C. Thadani, Mr. M.H. Nayak, Mr. Suresh Arora, Mr. Kishore Vengsarkar, Mr. Vinod Thadani, Mrs. Jaya Damodaran and Mr. Sanjay Lodha. Kindly enlighten me as to why the other two members viz. Mr. Anil Kapur and Mr. Laxman Gurbaxani who seem to
be isolated from your golden group not sign your said letter along with the other MC members? Was it because they were not invited to this so called meeting or is it that they refused to sign the letter which contained invalid and irrelevant explanations to shelter the wrong-doings of the consortium of the Managing Committee, Builder and the Architect. You and your committee members went on to
demoralise Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Saini (a Woman Senior Citizen) by not hesitating to institute both Civil and Criminal proceedings for defaming the honorary committee members. Since you could not prove her contentions and charges incorrect, why civil and criminal proceedings not be
initiated by the society members against all you 7 members who are signatories to the said letter of yours for defaming Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur and landing the redevelopment project of our society in a big mess. I wonder how Mrs. Veena Thadani, a High Court Advocate who is supporting the cause of the dance bar girls for the upliftment of women of our country would react to defamation of a woman, Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Saini, who is devotedly working for expediting the standstill
redevelopment project of our society in safeguarding her, and in framing the Managing Committee for their lingering attitude and tremendous delay beyond expections with the completion of only 2 towers in a period of 10 years and that too without OC along with various other non-complaince issues. However in the case of the redevelopment project of our society it appears that the same Mrs. Veena Thadani, who is also a member of the society and aided by her better half in supporting the irregularities and illegality of our society’s managing committee by giving an indirect protection to the MC members.
Sincerely yours,
RANJIT SINGH SAINI
Member, Flat No. A-30/1, Maitri Park CHSL.
c.c. : Members of Maitri Park CHSL.
Ranjit Singh Saini
FOR MEMBERS INFORMATION
Maitri Park CHSL In-house Bulletin
June 23, 2016 (Red Letter alert)
MAITRI BACHAAO .. REDEVELOPMENT KO AAGE LAAO
OC ... OC ... OC ...
The Inside Story and the Truth Declaration of our Society’s Redevelopment Project with
M/s. Hiranandani Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Architect and the Managing Committee
in the 5 years of elected period.
During the formation of the new Managing Committee in the year 2011 there was a revolution in the
society of having a change in getting transparency in the redevelopment project as the said redevelopment agreement was null and void and irregularities committed regarding issues on 70000 sq.ft. balconies, violation of agreement and other relevant issues introduction of PMC which was the main manfesto of the redevelopment project. All youngsters elected above the age group of 45 lend theirselves for bringing better prospects and for timely completion of the project by standing together. And today the whole committee with other tainted members whom we proposed and had confidence in, turned turtle, let down the whole society to a disgusting position. The so called member, in particular, Mr. Suresh Arora, a new born baby in whom the members had good faith in his transparency and good administration, reversed over a period of time along with Mr. Bhagwan Thadani and other 5 members, in influencing the other close members and friends who were the cream of this project viz. Mr. Anand Rao, Mr. Naval Shinde, Mr. Sunil Shahani, Mr. Virendra Khanna, Mr. Hemraj Gandhi, by taking them into confidence and giving them undue benefits to their advantage, like transferring of shares in flats of likelyhoods, giving extra benefit in carpet areas, making non-related blood relationship a shareholder in the new tower flats, assistance for internal flat repairs at the time of external building repairs for selected individuals, flat transfers and granting benefits to them from members sinking fund, creating agents and brokers in the society for buying and selling of flats,
cheating andbenefitting by committee members on single tender basis in road and building repair works with royalties and commissions, etc. To kill time and to gain advantage of maximum benefits for the builder with the new DC Rules, the Managing Committee, through the said members
initiated a propaganda of going in for new greenfield project and 1:1 flat. All these members along with Mr. Bhagwan Thadani, Mrs. Veena Thadani, Mr. Suresh Arora and the other Managing Committee Members had their meetings in the banquet hall of Mrs. Jaya Damodaran,
a Managing Committee member (in Building No. 22) which was specially made for the redevelopment project. The main purpose of these meetings was probably to garner support of most of the members of multi-storied buildings for benefitting the builder with maximum profit, and substantially personal gains for themselves and making a position for their future vote bank and in the process giving a step-motherly treatment to residents of F building by not hearing their grievances.
Achievements & Character of Mr. Suresh Arora
During the campaigning of elections in the year 2011, Mr. Suresh Arora and Mr. Laxman Gurbaxani went to meet Mr. Harish Hinduja at Veena Wines in Chembur for obtaining signature against Mr. Bhagwan Thadani, to which he obliged, prior to elections against the balcony issue of 70,000 Sq. ft. which was walloped by M/s. Hiranandani Constructions Pvt. Ltd. by cheating the society members, is now speaking in favour of the same Mr. Bhagwan Thadani. And now it seems Mr. Suresh Arora has gone and sat on the lap of the present Hon. Secretary adding to the other group of 5 MC members.
Mr. Suresh Arora was also instrumental in evicting the Beauty / Massage / Objectionable Parlour which was to come up in Building No. F, Flat No. 2 and which was purchased by a new member. As the then managing committee headed by Mr. Katyal (Hon. Chairman) and Mr. Bhagwan Thadani
(Hon. Secretary) did not take any action some of the members of our society pulled down the steel gate of the said upcoming Beauty Parlour and deposited the same in the society premises near the well. It has now been brought to my knowledge, and perhaps most of the society members may be knowing that the said Mr. Suresh Arora sold out the gate (amount in thousands) and siphoned off the
money instead of crediting the same in the society’s account.
His other achievements at his earlier residence in M/s. RNA Park CHSL, Vasinaka, Chembur would be brought to light very shortly.
All this mess has come about only because the members of our society are not united in coming forward to voice their opinion on this delayed redevelopment project. It is high time the members rise up and confront the current situation with a strong voice. Mr. Bhagwan Thadani was given a second golden opportunity as a Hon. Secretary to use his good office in expediting the redevelopment project. But instead he chose to go in for his and his family’s personal gains of buying, selling and renting of properties within the society and indirectly giving an advantage to the builder. At this juncture it is the members who have to judge and reject the current managing committee members (group of 7) for their ineffectiveness in taking forward the redevelopment project. The ball is in the members court to analyse the contributions made by the selected group of the managing committee and their other ancillary supporters, as mentioned hereinabove, and to consider the future redevelopment process of our
society with the required builders.
WAKE UP MAITRI PARK WAALO ...
EITHER IT IS NOW, OR NEVER EVER ...
No comments:
Post a Comment